Thursday, April 17, 2008

Polk County files response in same sex marriage case

Associated Press - Thursday, April 17, 2008

DES MOINES — The Polk County attorney's office has filed a response to legal documents opposing the state's ban on same-sex marriage.

The county attorney calls the ``friend of the court'' brief — filed by gay and lesbian groups as well as lawmakers from Massachusetts — ``less of a legal brief and more of postscript of inadmissible hearsay anecdotal remarks.''

The brief was filed in support of New York-based Lambda Legal, which filed a 2005 lawsuit that resulted in a Polk County ruling that Iowa's gay marriage ban was unconstitutional. The group filed its suit on behalf of six gay and lesbian couples from Iowa who were denied marriage licenses, as well as three of the couples' children.

The lawsuit names former Polk County recorder and registrar Timothy Brien.

In its filing this week, the county attorney's office argues that the ``friend of the court'' brief is based on news accounts after a decision in a Massachusetts gay marriage case.

``The brief is a collection of opinions without foundation and against which defendant cannot offer counter opinion in the time permitted ... not to mention available resources,'' the county attorney's office stated.

It said the Massachusetts decision has not been widely supported and that the dispute ``has been a political football.'' Polk County officials have maintained that the decision on gay marriage should be left to legislators, not the courts.

Camilla Taylor, Lambda Legal's lead attorney on the Iowa case, defended the brief.

``The brief from leaders in Massachusetts is relevant because it shows that gay couples have been marrying there for four years and the sky hasn't fallen,'' she said in a written statement. ``This issue ceases to be controversial once gay couples can marry — just like no-fault divorce and interracial marriage are no longer controversial.''

In all, there were 15 ``friend of the court'' briefs filed in support of Lambda Legal.

Officials with the Polk County attorney's office said the arguments in those other briefs will be addressed later in their response to the plaintiff's arguments.

The Iowa lawsuit prompted a ruling last August by Polk County District Court Judge Robert Hanson, who said the state law allowing marriage only between a man and a woman violates the constitutional rights of due process and equal protection.

The next day, Hanson stayed the decision, and the case is now before the Iowa Supreme Court.

Oral arguments will be scheduled by the Supreme Court in coming months, but a decision this year is unlikely.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Gay couples face higher tax burdens

MOUNT LAUREL, New Jersey (AP) -- For gay couples, the April 15 tax filing deadline can be a reminder of the disparities they face, even in a nation that is becoming more accepting of same-sex couples.

Beth Asaro and Joanne Schailey at their civil union ceremony in 2007.

Gay couples often pay higher taxes because they don't get the federal tax benefits that go with marriage. And for couples in state-sanctioned domestic partnerships, civil unions or same-sex marriages, filing federal income taxes can involve doing three sets of paperwork instead of one.

"It's a significant financial disability," said Beth Asaro, who last year entered into one of New Jersey's first legally recognized civil unions.

While the debate over government recognition of gay marriage is a political hot-button with arguments about morality, civil rights and tradition, the tax issue is a mostly practical one for hundreds of thousands of same-sex couples.

Most states ban gay marriage and don't recognize same-sex unions in any way. Only in Massachusetts can gay couples legally marry. Since 1997, nine other states and Washington D.C. started offering civil unions or domestic partnerships that give some or all the legal protections of marriage.

Those protections include allowing gay couples to file state taxes jointly -- and potentially save them money. But they can also make tax filing more complicated for the couples.

That's because the state protections do not help with federal taxes. Under the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, the government defines marriage as being allowed only between a man and a woman.

"You're running one household," said John Traier, a partner in the Butler, New Jersey, accounting firm Hammond & Traier. "But the federal government and a lot of states treat them as two households."

The same is true for straight unmarried straight couples who are living together.

There are two main effects of the different treatment under federal law.

One is the tax rate. Take two couples where one partner has a taxable income of $20,000 and the other makes $40,000. If they can file their federal taxes jointly, the tax bill would be $8,217.50. Filing separately, the combined bill would be $9,032.50 -- more than $800 higher.

Another disparity comes with the federal government's treatment of employer-provided health insurance, which also affects unmarried heterosexual couples.

For example, Dan Jessup is a project manager at JPMorgan Chase in Indiana. His partner, Bob Chenoweth, is self-employed, running two businesses out of the couple's Mooresville, Indiana, home. So Chenoweth gets health insurance through Chase.

But Jessup is required to count the company's cost of his partner's benefits as additional income for tax purposes.

State and federal taxes on those benefits cost about $1,800 per year, Jessup said.

"I certainly think about it every payday," when the extra withholding is taken from his paycheck, he said. "If you think about 10 years, $18,000 is a lot of money. That could buy me a pretty nice car."

The tax on benefits for domestic partners also applies to employers. Companies including Chase are endorsing the Human Rights Campaign's push for a bill that would end the tax on health plan benefits for people who are neither the spouse nor legal dependent of the employee. Versions of the bill have been introduced in Congress in the last three sessions, but have never moved out of committee.

A government analysis estimated the bill would cost about $10 billion in lost federal tax revenue over 10 years. Advocates for the bill say it would create savings elsewhere, including reducing the Medicaid rolls.

Ryan Ellis, the tax policy director for Americans for Tax Reform, said his group supports the concept, but not the specific language of the bill, because it does not propose increasing how much domestic partners could put into health savings accounts.

It's not just the higher bills that can be frustrating for same-sex taxpayers; it's also the process of filing taxes, particularly in states that offer some joint benefits to gay couples.

"I don't want to say it's chaotic, but it's very difficult for a lot of reasons," said Traier, the accountant who is in a civil union partnership himself.

In New Jersey and the other states where same-sex unions are formally recognized, couples can file their state taxes jointly, but they must file their federal tax returns as individuals.

That means doing income calculations twice. Many tax programs such as Intuit's TurboTax are set up to deal with that extra math.

But there are other issues where even up-to-date software might not solve.

These issues also affect unmarried straight couples.

For instance, couples with children must decide which partner gets to claim them as dependents for tax purposes on federal returns and returns in states that don't recognize same-sex unions. Similarly, couples who own homes together have to sort out how much of the mortgage interest payments each partner gets to use as a deduction, said Lara Schwartz, the Human Rights Campaign legal director.

"If you are not a different sex," from your partner, Schwartz said, "you are strangers, basically, under federal law."

Sunday, April 13, 2008

California's Governor Vows to OPPOSE Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment

Amicus Info Sessions by One Iowa



One Iowa would like to remind you of the Amicus Event
coming up tomorrow:


Cedar Rapids
Monday, April 14th at 5:30pm
Legion Arts, 1103 3rd St SE

RSVP: http://eqfed.org/oneiowa/events/cramicus/details.tcl or contact Matthew Skuya at 515.288.4019.

One Iowa staff will be available to answer your questions and will be presenting about the Written arguments submitted by Lambda Legal on March 28th.

In addition, One Iowa will be hosting a conference call with Camilla Taylor, Senior Staff Attorney in Lambda Legal's Midwest Regional Office in Chicago. All are welcome to join us for this call to hear an update on the case and how you can become more involved with One Iowa.

Conference Call Update
April 16th, 12:00pm
Dial in number: 1.888.346.3950
Call Code: 669002

Be sure to join One Iowa staff and hear more about the Amicus briefs and how you can get involved to support Civil Marriage Equality in the state of Iowa!

- One Iowa

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Support Equality - Become a Member!

Membership with One Iowa

Support One Iowa's work through membership with One Iowa.
>> Click Here to join today!

$10 - Junior Supporter
$20 - Junior Member
$35 - One Iowa Member
$100 - One Iowa Member Plus
$500 - Capitol Steps Club

Capitol Steps Club

You can also choose to become a repeating supporter to the One Iowa Education Fund, giving a convenient monthly donation that, for a limited time, is matched 100% by the Gill Foundation!
>> Click Here to learn more!

Join our Action Center

Sign up for breaking news, updates, and action alerts. Keep informed and learn how to help!
>> Click Here to join today!

Your finances, your future - it's all in how you plan




Financial advisor and Advocate contributor Joe Kapp and his colleague Nick Burkholder, both registered representatives and investment advisor representatives with Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., have penned an article in the March 2008 edition of the Journal of Financial Planning that focuses on the issues concerning financial and estate planning for gay men, lesbians, and same-sex couples. We posted a link to the article yesterday, but this topic is so important that we wanted to draw attention to the main points of the Executive Summary:
  • Gay men, lesbians, and same-sex couples present significantly different financial and estate planning issues from traditional married couples. This article addresses those differences and shows planners how to work with this underserved niche market.
  • Under federal law, same-sex couples may not marry. Yet there are 1,138 federal statutes in which marital status affects the ability to receive federal benefits. Furthermore, states have their own complex and often contradictory sets of laws in this area.
  • Before the first client meeting, planners should review, among other things, their documents in order to avoid such terms as “Mr.” and “Mrs.” They also should review their software programs, which typically make calculations for couples on the basis that they are legally married.
  • Estate taxes are a concern to same-sex couples because they cannot benefit from the unlimited marital deduction. Hence, the use of life insurance is often critical—yet it, too, presents planning challenges, such as the issue of insurable interest and being sure the insurance is out of a client’s estate.
  • Assets must be titled carefully when setting up jointly owned banking and investment accounts, or buying property, and clients may need to make creative use of the annual gift exclusion and the lifetime gift exemption. Same-sex couples may make especially good use of the grantor retained income trust.
  • The advisor needs to inquire about the client’s family situation, as family members may not know or approve of the client’s sexual orientation, which can result in financial and legal complications upon death.
  • Adoption of children is a common option, but complicated and typically expensive for many same-sex couples.
  • More companies are offering benefits for same-sex domestic partners, but it’s not always advisable for the partner to accept the offer because of potential income-tax liability.

This article is a must-read for everyone in our community. You can download a printer-friendly copy of the full article here (.pdf)

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Learn more about the Amicus Briefs submitted in the Iowa Civil Marriage case!

Dear friends,

On Friday March 28, sixteen “friend-of-the-court” briefs or Amicus briefs were filed with the Iowa Supreme Court on behalf of the six same-sex couples and their families seeking marriage in Iowa. Along with Lambda Legal and other national signatories, over 250 of the individual brief signatories are Iowans, likely representing thousands of other Iowans through each signatory organization's membership. One Iowa and many of our partner organizations in Iowa are proud to be represented in this historic journey toward equality.

In celebration of this historic case, One Iowa is hosting four Amicus Brief events across the state to give an update on the case, focus on the “friend-of-the-court” briefs, and discuss how you can become more involved in this campaign toward equality. Upcoming events will be:

Des Moines
Tuesday, April 8th at 5:30pm
Ritual Cafe - 13th street (between Grand and Locust)

Cedar Falls/Waterloo
Wednesday, April 9th at 5pm
Cottonwood Canyon, 218 East 4th St.

Council Bluffs
Thursday, April 10th at 6:00pm
Location TBD (will be announced in the reminder email on Wednesday April 9th)

Cedar Rapids
Monday, April 14th at 5:30pm
Legion Arts, 1103 3rd St SE

In addition, One Iowa will be hosting a conference call with Camilla Taylor, Senior Staff Attorney in Lambda Legal's Midwest Regional Office in Chicago. All are welcome to join us for this call to hear an update on the case and how you can become more involved with One Iowa.

Conference Call Update
April 16th, 12:00pm
Dial in number: 1.888.346.3950
Call Code: 669002

Be sure to join One Iowa staff and hear more about the Amicus briefs and how you can get involved to support Civil Marriage Equality in the state of Iowa!

- One Iowa